Yet again More Mizz Thang needin dah Reality
So, we saw in Mizz Nevawuz Oma Hamou's recent online missives, that she wrote just last month:
In that email I inferred that if Father M* was saying that I owed money to the Church then he was lying. I also revealed a private matter which should have remained a private matter. I told Bob that when Father M* didn't deposit the checks I had given him in New York that he stated his life was in danger because he was not able to pay for the works I commissioned. I sent additional money to Father M*. When I arrived in Russia I went, with Father M*, to the bank to demand answers concerning my checks. It was then I learned that days prior to my arrival the church collected the funds from my checks
Father M* did not steal anything from me! :x
Back in 2000, I gave Father M* two cashiers checks that total $10,000 to pay for works Enigma commissioned inside Fedorovsky Cathedral located in Pushkin, Russia. Father M* is a monk, who took the cashiers check back to Russia and was told by someone that the checks were no good so he placed them inside his desk drawer and they sat there for more than 2-3 months. Suffice it to say, the checks were eventually deposited and honored by my bank and the whole mess was chalked up as being a misunderstanding.
In 2001, unbeknowst to both Father M* and myself Bob Atchison 'promised' to pay an individual in Russia to intercept Enigma's letters to the church and send them to him
WEEEELLLLL Kiddies, guess what we found online in the internet archives, seems ole Mizz Thang Nevahwuz Oma Hamou done said different before. Here is what we found, NOTICE THE DATES, and we quote:
In an email of June 21, 2004: Hamou continues to accuse Bob Atchison (the misspellings and poor grammar are from her original): "You crossed the line when you involved the Russian Orthodox Church, your a scumbag! I am going to make certain that you are prosecuted for what you've done to Father M. and to me...Your lies are going to come back and bite you in your ass. I know that if Father M. said anything like this to you that I will make certain that HE will be held accountable for this lie. But I know that he didn't tell you this. It is as it has always been in your imagination. "
Yet, here is what Hamou wrote to Bob Atchison almost exactly one year earlier on July 23, 2003:
"Dear Robert Atchinson (sic)...And I do understand why you felt compelled to defend Father M., but you don't know what happened. You do not know how much I gave to this priest because I have the accounting records, nor do you know the tricks that he used in order to get more money. He lied. But I am not the first victim. You do not know that Father M. wrote to me that he was going to be murdered if I didn't send money and I had sent money and did give ALOT OF MONEY. I will never bring about a scandal for the Church this I promised to His Holiness but see your the one that writes to people on poor Saintly Father M. and you have no idea what you are doing. Father M. is under investigation not because of me, but because of several reasons and it involves many people. I was like you, I trusted and believed that all that this wonderful priest said and did was the truth and it wasn't."
In another email also of July 23, 2003 Hamou again wrote Bob Atchison:
"Just in case you believe that I have no proof on Father M., I do. I have his letters, written by his own hand, and I have witnesses- he did write to me and tell me that he would be murdered by his workers, it was all a lie to get me to send more money and I did. You do not know all the stuff that happened. No one has told you. As to HOW MUCH MONEY I gave to him and what I did give to HIM, I have the evidence, the western union, the bank records and I have placed my hand on the BOOK OF THE GOSPELS, because I am not lying. And so when you write to others on my destroying a priest, you must know that what you are doing is forcing me to defend what happened and bringing the matter concerning Father M. to a surface when I think that he would rather want this to go away. There are good and bad in every religion.
OK, so, now she says it was all cleared up WAY back in 2001, but THEN she wrote letters in 2003 accusing the priest of lying and conning her. Now she says this Atchison guy 'made the whole thing up and is lying". But wait, Oma Hamou SAID the priest was a liar, stole money from her, she was the priest's victim. Now she denies it all...Hmmmmm, we already KNOW you can say Hypocrite kiddies...can't you?
UPDATE: 4-24
SO Kiddies, Mizz Thang admits the letters are real. She only says that to understand what was going on "You have to see what was written by whom" First, it was "what was written by WHO" not whom. Lord can't anyone understand English grammar anymore?
OK: Lets examine what was written and by who wrote it.
Mizz Nevahwuz Oma Hamou wrote:
1. nor do you know the tricks that he used in order to get more money. OK. she says Father M. tricked her out of money.
2. He lied Self explanatory.
3. But I am not the first victim ditto.
4. You do not know that Father M. wrote to me that he was going to be murdered if I didn't send money and I had sent money and did give ALOT OF MONEY ditto
5. Father M. is under investigation not because of me, but because of several reasons and it involves many people So, the priest is "under investigation"....she said.
6. I trusted and believed that all that this wonderful priest said and did was the truth and it wasn't OK, Oma Hamou said the priest was a liar.
7. it was all a lie to get me to send more money and I did. OK, so Oma Hamou said again Father M. lied to her to obtain money under false pretenses.
8. I have placed my hand on the BOOK OF THE GOSPELS, because I am not lying. So Oma Hamou said that she swore on the Bible that these statements are TRUE.
9. You do not know all the stuff that happened. No one has told you Hmmm Oma Hamou implies that there is even more "stuff" the priest did.
9. so when you write to others on my destroying a priest, you must know that what you are doing is forcing me to defend what happened and bringing the matter concerning Father M. to a surface when I think that he would rather want this to go away. So Oma Hamou says that Atchison told people that she had "destroyed" the priest and the only result of his doing so would be for Oma Hamou to make this priest's lies and crimes public...
Now Mizz Thang Nevahwuz is big on this "time line of events" she says. So WATCH THE DATES, she wrote this stuff in 2003, about events TWO YEARS earlier in 2001. Yet by 2004 and since, she now denies the accusations against the Priest saying that it was all cleared up in 2001. Don't let her obfuscate this issue with anything she says Atchison wrote, since all WE care about here is what Oma Hamou said in 2003, when she WROTE BOB ATCHISON AND TOLD HIM THAT SHE SWORE ON A BIBLE THAT FATHER M. WAS A LIAR AND STOLE MONEY FROM HER TWO YEARS EARLIER.
OH, since she wants to know where we "got" the letters, which she confirmed she DID write, they're in the Internet Archives,
http://web.archive.org/web/20040805173334/http://omahamoureport.org/Omalies1.html
with LOTS of other cool stuff about Mizz Nevahwuz Wannabee Oma Hamou...since she asked...
This page references Oma Hamou's Russian "Project Manager" as writing, about this VERY incident:
And as a religious person I blame myself, that I didn't obliterate the documents, when I saw them, discrediting F.Markell. We know that they were trumped-up and they are the real forgeries, created to save Ms.Oma in her troubles with the money spent here or there, but now she can use this information against F.M himself in her goals. He has suffered from her. About her money, accounts, etc.: We have had here several times with things like: wasting of her money, stolen wallet, or loosing passport... All these were the lies and only for to get rid of someone, or to use someone."
Now we can't confirm this, but it's there with the letters from 2003 that she confirms she wrote.
In that email I inferred that if Father M* was saying that I owed money to the Church then he was lying. I also revealed a private matter which should have remained a private matter. I told Bob that when Father M* didn't deposit the checks I had given him in New York that he stated his life was in danger because he was not able to pay for the works I commissioned. I sent additional money to Father M*. When I arrived in Russia I went, with Father M*, to the bank to demand answers concerning my checks. It was then I learned that days prior to my arrival the church collected the funds from my checks
Father M* did not steal anything from me! :x
Back in 2000, I gave Father M* two cashiers checks that total $10,000 to pay for works Enigma commissioned inside Fedorovsky Cathedral located in Pushkin, Russia. Father M* is a monk, who took the cashiers check back to Russia and was told by someone that the checks were no good so he placed them inside his desk drawer and they sat there for more than 2-3 months. Suffice it to say, the checks were eventually deposited and honored by my bank and the whole mess was chalked up as being a misunderstanding.
In 2001, unbeknowst to both Father M* and myself Bob Atchison 'promised' to pay an individual in Russia to intercept Enigma's letters to the church and send them to him
WEEEELLLLL Kiddies, guess what we found online in the internet archives, seems ole Mizz Thang Nevahwuz Oma Hamou done said different before. Here is what we found, NOTICE THE DATES, and we quote:
In an email of June 21, 2004: Hamou continues to accuse Bob Atchison (the misspellings and poor grammar are from her original): "You crossed the line when you involved the Russian Orthodox Church, your a scumbag! I am going to make certain that you are prosecuted for what you've done to Father M. and to me...Your lies are going to come back and bite you in your ass. I know that if Father M. said anything like this to you that I will make certain that HE will be held accountable for this lie. But I know that he didn't tell you this. It is as it has always been in your imagination. "
Yet, here is what Hamou wrote to Bob Atchison almost exactly one year earlier on July 23, 2003:
"Dear Robert Atchinson (sic)...And I do understand why you felt compelled to defend Father M., but you don't know what happened. You do not know how much I gave to this priest because I have the accounting records, nor do you know the tricks that he used in order to get more money. He lied. But I am not the first victim. You do not know that Father M. wrote to me that he was going to be murdered if I didn't send money and I had sent money and did give ALOT OF MONEY. I will never bring about a scandal for the Church this I promised to His Holiness but see your the one that writes to people on poor Saintly Father M. and you have no idea what you are doing. Father M. is under investigation not because of me, but because of several reasons and it involves many people. I was like you, I trusted and believed that all that this wonderful priest said and did was the truth and it wasn't."
In another email also of July 23, 2003 Hamou again wrote Bob Atchison:
"Just in case you believe that I have no proof on Father M., I do. I have his letters, written by his own hand, and I have witnesses- he did write to me and tell me that he would be murdered by his workers, it was all a lie to get me to send more money and I did. You do not know all the stuff that happened. No one has told you. As to HOW MUCH MONEY I gave to him and what I did give to HIM, I have the evidence, the western union, the bank records and I have placed my hand on the BOOK OF THE GOSPELS, because I am not lying. And so when you write to others on my destroying a priest, you must know that what you are doing is forcing me to defend what happened and bringing the matter concerning Father M. to a surface when I think that he would rather want this to go away. There are good and bad in every religion.
OK, so, now she says it was all cleared up WAY back in 2001, but THEN she wrote letters in 2003 accusing the priest of lying and conning her. Now she says this Atchison guy 'made the whole thing up and is lying". But wait, Oma Hamou SAID the priest was a liar, stole money from her, she was the priest's victim. Now she denies it all...Hmmmmm, we already KNOW you can say Hypocrite kiddies...can't you?
UPDATE: 4-24
SO Kiddies, Mizz Thang admits the letters are real. She only says that to understand what was going on "You have to see what was written by whom" First, it was "what was written by WHO" not whom. Lord can't anyone understand English grammar anymore?
OK: Lets examine what was written and by who wrote it.
Mizz Nevahwuz Oma Hamou wrote:
1. nor do you know the tricks that he used in order to get more money. OK. she says Father M. tricked her out of money.
2. He lied Self explanatory.
3. But I am not the first victim ditto.
4. You do not know that Father M. wrote to me that he was going to be murdered if I didn't send money and I had sent money and did give ALOT OF MONEY ditto
5. Father M. is under investigation not because of me, but because of several reasons and it involves many people So, the priest is "under investigation"....she said.
6. I trusted and believed that all that this wonderful priest said and did was the truth and it wasn't OK, Oma Hamou said the priest was a liar.
7. it was all a lie to get me to send more money and I did. OK, so Oma Hamou said again Father M. lied to her to obtain money under false pretenses.
8. I have placed my hand on the BOOK OF THE GOSPELS, because I am not lying. So Oma Hamou said that she swore on the Bible that these statements are TRUE.
9. You do not know all the stuff that happened. No one has told you Hmmm Oma Hamou implies that there is even more "stuff" the priest did.
9. so when you write to others on my destroying a priest, you must know that what you are doing is forcing me to defend what happened and bringing the matter concerning Father M. to a surface when I think that he would rather want this to go away. So Oma Hamou says that Atchison told people that she had "destroyed" the priest and the only result of his doing so would be for Oma Hamou to make this priest's lies and crimes public...
Now Mizz Thang Nevahwuz is big on this "time line of events" she says. So WATCH THE DATES, she wrote this stuff in 2003, about events TWO YEARS earlier in 2001. Yet by 2004 and since, she now denies the accusations against the Priest saying that it was all cleared up in 2001. Don't let her obfuscate this issue with anything she says Atchison wrote, since all WE care about here is what Oma Hamou said in 2003, when she WROTE BOB ATCHISON AND TOLD HIM THAT SHE SWORE ON A BIBLE THAT FATHER M. WAS A LIAR AND STOLE MONEY FROM HER TWO YEARS EARLIER.
OH, since she wants to know where we "got" the letters, which she confirmed she DID write, they're in the Internet Archives,
http://web.archive.org/web/20040805173334/http://omahamoureport.org/Omalies1.html
with LOTS of other cool stuff about Mizz Nevahwuz Wannabee Oma Hamou...since she asked...
This page references Oma Hamou's Russian "Project Manager" as writing, about this VERY incident:
And as a religious person I blame myself, that I didn't obliterate the documents, when I saw them, discrediting F.Markell. We know that they were trumped-up and they are the real forgeries, created to save Ms.Oma in her troubles with the money spent here or there, but now she can use this information against F.M himself in her goals. He has suffered from her. About her money, accounts, etc.: We have had here several times with things like: wasting of her money, stolen wallet, or loosing passport... All these were the lies and only for to get rid of someone, or to use someone."
Now we can't confirm this, but it's there with the letters from 2003 that she confirms she wrote.
posted by Watchtower at 12:00 PM
<< Home