One Major Piece of Da Reality Uncovered.
OK, Check it peeps:
First, Oma Hamou says under oath she has THREE FELONY CONVICTIONS IN UTAH:
THEN Oma Hamou says "no, there is only ONE Utah Conviction, that's a typo"...her exact words October 2008: There is not a second conviction from the State of Utah against me. For those of you who still believe that I do have 2 Felony convictions in the State of Utah, please feel free to contact the Park County District Clerk of Court's office concerning my conviction at 435-615-4300.
So, lets do the fact checking:
Conviction ONE:
November 7, 1991: Oma McConnell" (aka Oma Demian) was convicted in the State of Utah, Park City District Court, Utah Administrative Office of the Courts case number 2218-911613381, of the 2nd degree Felony crime of "Theft By Deception" in violation of Utah Criminal Statue 76-6-405, and a disposition of "Guilty" has been entered in that Court for this crime.
TWO:
January 13, 1992:
Oma Demain (aka Oma Ashkenazy Demian, Oma McConnell and Oma Ashkenazy) Convicted of 2nd Degree Felony Crime "Theft by Deception"Case number 1338 and recieved a 36 month suspended sentence in Coalville District of Utah.
THREE:
October 26, 1994:
Charge 1 - 76-6-405 - THEFT BY DECEPTION 2nd Degree Felony Plea: October 26, 1994 Guilty Disposition: April 03, 2002 Guilty Defendant Name: OMA AKA DEMIAN Offense tracking number: 521598 Park City District Utah.
Ummm, How exactly "can" just "one" bad check turn into THREE Felony charges?? one in 1991, a SECOND in 1992, then a THIRD in 1994?
This be one big ole King Sized Triple Whopper.
Here is another one still ongoing:
Oma Hamou and her sockpuppets all keep attributing ownership of this blog to "Rob Moshien" or "Bob Atchison" or "Pallasart". They assert this as if it were fact.
THEY DO NOT KNOW WHO OWNS THIS BLOG. They have stated this as fact now for YEARS. Here is some old time stuff they've said:
August 30, 2006: As a P.S. I understand that we should find out from Google who is behind the new blog by the end of the week… (It seems that the criminal aspect of this situation is taking care of that detail for us.)
August 31, 2006: We now know who created the Oma Hamou Reality Blog. It was handled under proper legal procedures, so that when it comes time for court (Civil/Criminal) it will be acceptable as evidence.
On May 27, 2008 Oma Hamou wrote under her own name (for a rare change): "On their blog they pretend to be a third person and say they are not Rob Moshein or Bob Atchison, I know who the Blog belongs to because law enforcement told me."
These are just a few of the HUNDREDS of such assertions. Here is the REALITY:
Under federal law, (US Code Title47, Ch. 5 SS 551) an ISP such as Google is required to notify a blogger if there has been a request for his identity even by Law Enforcement. A court is then asked to consider compelling the ISP to unmask the blogger, either because an ISP files suit asking for such relief or a blogger files a John Doe suit to maintain his anonymity.
In other words, Google can NOT legally reveal the identity of a blogger even to law enforcement without first 1. TELLING the blogger of the request, then 2. Giving the blogger the opportunity to refuse the request, 3. THEN the Court has a hearing, where the blogger can be heard by the Court to ask anonymously that their identity be protected 4. The Court THEN will decide to issue the order.
In Short: There is NO circumstance short of our advocating some sort of anti government terrorist acts, WHICH WE CERTAINLY DO NOT, which would trigger Homeland Security powers where Google would tell ANYONE our identity without our first being notified and without a Court Order where we would be given the chance to be heard. EVER. We certainly never advocated any harm, physical or otherwise to Hamou. Our blog is in no way "criminal activity" as we have NEVER advocted harm to anyone, but even then, the Federal notice rules apply to Law Enforcement. In fact, we could sue Google for damages if the DO release personal information without first telling us and getting the Court order. Take that to the bank. Its Federal Law.
SO: Oma Hamou's statement that "I know who the Blog belongs to because law enforcement told me." IS WHOLLY DECEPTIVE AS IT IS NOT TRUE. GOOGLE CONFIRMED IT FOR US, SPECIFICALLY. Oma Hamou does NOT know who writes this blog, and she certainly did not get the information from Law Enforcement, as Law Enforcement has NOT asked Google
First, Oma Hamou says under oath she has THREE FELONY CONVICTIONS IN UTAH:
THEN Oma Hamou says "no, there is only ONE Utah Conviction, that's a typo"...her exact words October 2008: There is not a second conviction from the State of Utah against me. For those of you who still believe that I do have 2 Felony convictions in the State of Utah, please feel free to contact the Park County District Clerk of Court's office concerning my conviction at 435-615-4300.
So, lets do the fact checking:
Conviction ONE:
November 7, 1991: Oma McConnell" (aka Oma Demian) was convicted in the State of Utah, Park City District Court, Utah Administrative Office of the Courts case number 2218-911613381, of the 2nd degree Felony crime of "Theft By Deception" in violation of Utah Criminal Statue 76-6-405, and a disposition of "Guilty" has been entered in that Court for this crime.
TWO:
January 13, 1992:
Oma Demain (aka Oma Ashkenazy Demian, Oma McConnell and Oma Ashkenazy) Convicted of 2nd Degree Felony Crime "Theft by Deception"Case number 1338 and recieved a 36 month suspended sentence in Coalville District of Utah.
THREE:
October 26, 1994:
Charge 1 - 76-6-405 - THEFT BY DECEPTION 2nd Degree Felony Plea: October 26, 1994 Guilty Disposition: April 03, 2002 Guilty Defendant Name: OMA AKA DEMIAN Offense tracking number: 521598 Park City District Utah.
Ummm, How exactly "can" just "one" bad check turn into THREE Felony charges?? one in 1991, a SECOND in 1992, then a THIRD in 1994?
This be one big ole King Sized Triple Whopper.
Here is another one still ongoing:
Oma Hamou and her sockpuppets all keep attributing ownership of this blog to "Rob Moshien" or "Bob Atchison" or "Pallasart". They assert this as if it were fact.
THEY DO NOT KNOW WHO OWNS THIS BLOG. They have stated this as fact now for YEARS. Here is some old time stuff they've said:
August 30, 2006: As a P.S. I understand that we should find out from Google who is behind the new blog by the end of the week… (It seems that the criminal aspect of this situation is taking care of that detail for us.)
August 31, 2006: We now know who created the Oma Hamou Reality Blog. It was handled under proper legal procedures, so that when it comes time for court (Civil/Criminal) it will be acceptable as evidence.
On May 27, 2008 Oma Hamou wrote under her own name (for a rare change): "On their blog they pretend to be a third person and say they are not Rob Moshein or Bob Atchison, I know who the Blog belongs to because law enforcement told me."
These are just a few of the HUNDREDS of such assertions. Here is the REALITY:
Under federal law, (US Code Title47, Ch. 5 SS 551) an ISP such as Google is required to notify a blogger if there has been a request for his identity even by Law Enforcement. A court is then asked to consider compelling the ISP to unmask the blogger, either because an ISP files suit asking for such relief or a blogger files a John Doe suit to maintain his anonymity.
In other words, Google can NOT legally reveal the identity of a blogger even to law enforcement without first 1. TELLING the blogger of the request, then 2. Giving the blogger the opportunity to refuse the request, 3. THEN the Court has a hearing, where the blogger can be heard by the Court to ask anonymously that their identity be protected 4. The Court THEN will decide to issue the order.
In Short: There is NO circumstance short of our advocating some sort of anti government terrorist acts, WHICH WE CERTAINLY DO NOT, which would trigger Homeland Security powers where Google would tell ANYONE our identity without our first being notified and without a Court Order where we would be given the chance to be heard. EVER. We certainly never advocated any harm, physical or otherwise to Hamou. Our blog is in no way "criminal activity" as we have NEVER advocted harm to anyone, but even then, the Federal notice rules apply to Law Enforcement. In fact, we could sue Google for damages if the DO release personal information without first telling us and getting the Court order. Take that to the bank. Its Federal Law.
SO: Oma Hamou's statement that "I know who the Blog belongs to because law enforcement told me." IS WHOLLY DECEPTIVE AS IT IS NOT TRUE. GOOGLE CONFIRMED IT FOR US, SPECIFICALLY. Oma Hamou does NOT know who writes this blog, and she certainly did not get the information from Law Enforcement, as Law Enforcement has NOT asked Google
posted by Watchtower at 8:36 AM
<< Home