More Oma Hamou Reality - poor Miss thang.

OK! So, Oma Hamou says we are "intentionally misleading" you dear readers, and we are "falsifying" or "manipulating" the evidence...

We questioned her "bio" that said "Oma is currently a member of the California Attorney's for Criminal Justice". SO, Miss thang Oma Hamou puts out there a membership receipt to prove we were wrong, when our local bud a practicing Attorney here in So Cal looked her up and found no current listing for her.

SOME OMA HAMOU REALITY:
The receipt Hamou posted, above, is clearly dated June 20, 2001 and covers the period from July 1,2001 thru June 30, 2002. NOW, the puffball bio piece first appears in the Internet Archives in February 2004. The bottom of the page has a "copyright" dated 2003. Oma Hamou left this bio up on the web and this statement is still there today! Now, the statement is out there that OMA HAMOU IS A MEMBER of that organization long after the period covered by her SO-CALLED PROOF. Clearly, any casual reader of this bio would assume, rather logically, that Oma Hamou IS TODAY a member of this organization. However, Oma Hamou thru Mouthpiece boyfriend Mike Newson at least ADMITS that "she is not now a member". Notice the tap dancing here? Why is the "bio" not dated specifically? Why did Hamou not offer a receipt covering the period the bio SAID she was a member? Why did the bio not say Oma Hamou WAS a member? instead, she buys one year membership for $65, so she can for many years later continue to imply she "IS" still a member. Query you should ask Oma Hamou Miss Thang: Was Oma Hamou a member of this organization during the period of 2003, 2004, 2005 and 2006 when that statement is being made to the public? Notice she does NOT put this easily confirmed evidence out there, but rather chooses to IMPLY the answer rather than PROVIDE the answer.

Scroll down kiddoes to the Dunn & Bradstreet report from October 2000. Notice something "interesting" in that report? I do...It says "She (Oma Hamou) further indicated that she is a member of the California Attorneys for Criminal Justice" the report then says : "A check with the California Attorneys for Criminal Justice on October 21, 2000 found no record of Oma Hamou as a member.". Well DUH, of course it didn't, she was not a member until some eight or nine months after she stated to Dunn & Bradstreet that she WAS a member.

Sounds familiar...no?

Part 2: Oma Hamou (via her usual fictional mouthpiece boyfriend Mike Newson) asked "why would someone ask a California Attorney who specializes in “criminal law” to verify if Oma’s name appears in a directory of lawyers (as it appears from what was written is where they looked) when one she isn’t an attorney and two --- the article in question specifically reads: “Oma is a member of the California Attorney’s for Criminal Justice” an organization based out of San Francisco."
VERY simple Miss Oma Hamou Wannbee Miss Thang: "IF" you WERE a member of this organization, you would know that A. the membership is not restricted to attorneys, anyone, like Oma Hamou, can cough up the membership fee and be an "associate" member.
B. HOWEVER, the membership ROSTER is available ONLY to Attorneys, so it was just easier to ask our bud who already HAS the current membership roster. The membership roster is NOT "a directory of lawyers....". But again, if you HAD a membership roster AS A MEMBER, you would have known that. DUH.
C. WHAT possible diff could it make that the organization is based out of SF? Its membership is statewide, just read their website.

At least she can't accuse us of making up THESE facts, they're taken from her own website and independent documents, you know, like Dunn & Bradstreet. Wait, maybe D&B is part of that vast "anti-Oma" conspiracy she blathers on for pages and pages about.

See, notice Oma Hamou's tapdance to make implications here that don't exist?? Isn't that what she accuses US of doing?? hmmm.

More later kiddies...