It's about Credibility, Stupid....
Oma Hamou uses her psycho boyfriend alter ego to say that we must HATE Oma Hamou because we say things about her. We don't even KNOW Oma Hamou, Never met wannabee chica playah. Don't care, and don't really want to. So what is it really about?
It's about credibility, stupid!
Updated December 6, 2006
(Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.0.1):
it's
1. contraction of it is)
The Oma Hamou Reality: Oma Hamou writes virtually nothing under her own name. Three "blogs" now appear with no purpose other than to repeat the same stuff over and over and over and over and over between them. ALL of them quoting "Mike Newson" or "Justin Edwards" or anybody EXCEPT Oma Hamou. There, of course, is no verification of WHO these people are, other than their "I am who I say I am, but won't give you any genuine proof."
So is that really, genuinely credible when it comes to any information about Oma Hamou?
We decided to examine the credibilty of Mike Newson, just in case he "is" real:
http://whoismikenewson.blogspot.com/
The Oma Hamou Reality: Whenever anyone questions Oma Hamou's background, statements, credentials, references, contacts, history or her own self published bio, she starts ranting on and on and on and on and on and on ad nauseum about this Bob Atchison guy. There is precious little actually out there about Oma Hamou, so why does she scream on and on about somebody else when the GENUINE FOCUS is Oma Hamou?
So is any of that really, genuinely credible when it comes to any information about Oma Hamou?
The Oma Hamou Reality: Oma Hamou says she is a busy Motion Picture Producer. Oma Hamou has no offices, no business address other than a cheap Pak n Mail PO box drop, no business telephone and no Federal or California Employer ID numbers (required to actually have the "employees" she says she has). Oma Hamou SAID she had offices in Russia, in the town of Pushkin and published an adddress to make it appear she HAD Russian offices. The Oma Hamou reality was that the building was then and still is a vacant ruin. The Orthodox Church which owns the building had given Oma Hamou an agreement six years ago that IF she restored the building, THEN she could use it for offices. The Oma Hamou Reality is that since she did NOTHING to restore the building in the last six years, she has never had offices there.
So is any of what little Oma Hamou DOES say about her business really, genuinely credible when it comes to any of the alleged information about Oma Hamou or her business she publishes?
The Oma Hamou Reality: Oma Hamou writes almost daily that she is nothing but a "victim" in her life. First her abusive father, then abusive husband, then psychotic stalker Bob Atchison. She was "forced" to commit felonies, she was "conned" into amassing huge judgments against her and substantial debt. Dunn & Bradstreet has a report with Oma Hamou's NAME and information all over it, which was proven by them to be essentially all lies, but Oma Hamou says "Someone ELSE forged the Dunn & Bradstreet report". Come on, When does Oma Hamou take ANY GENUINE RESPONSIBILITY FOR HER ACTIONS AND HER LIFE? Interestingly, never it appears.
So is any of what little Oma Hamou DOES say is it really, genuinely credible?
The Oma Hamou Reality: Oma Hamou insists that anything negative that anyone anywhere EVER says about her MUST be at the beck and call and direction of that Bob Atchison fellow. "We" must be Bob Atchison...there was a fellow on a website calling himself "Vapors", they said HE was Bob Atchison too...until Vapors proved he wasn't...THEN they said he MUST be part of the conspiracy...I mean, this Atchison guy is made out to be Dr. Evil reaching out and influencing governmental agencies, the FBI, police departments across the country, banks, studios, etc etc. . All the people who say bad things about Oma Hamou MUST be part of the conspiracy JUST BECAUSE they come up with the same information. Think about that for just one second. Maybe, just MAYBE, different people come up with the same story about Oma Hamou because the stuff they come up with is the truth.
So is any of this vast conspiracy theory really something to support Oma Hamou and find her genuinely credible when it comes to anything she says?
The Oma Hamou Reality: Oma Hamou is a convicted felon. Does it really MATTER if it is the five felonies that different people all seem to have found in the records OR the three felony convictions Hamou does fess up to ? The Oma Hamou Reality is that this chick committed crimes of Theft by Deception, Fraud, and Passing Bad Checks. Further, she failed to live up to the Court Ordered Terms of her Probation and was arrested Three MORE times as a Felony Fugitive From Justice. Oma Hamou says that it was "just one bad check" that "SOMEHOW" ends up creating three felonies in three states. Some magic check, huh? Oma Hamou says "hey EVERYBODY has a bounced check in their past. True enough, me included HOWEVER SHE OVERLOOKS THE FACT THAT 99.99% OF PEOPLE AREN'T CONVICTED OF FELONIES AS A RESULT.
So is this background helpful to find anything Oma Hamou says to be genuinely credible when it comes to any information about Oma Hamou?
The Oma Hamou Reality: Oma Hamou steadfastly and stubbornly refuses to provide specific information about her career as an actress, model and her experience sufficient to make her a real Motion Picture Producer. THE SIXTY FOUR THOUSAND DOLLAR QUESTION IS WHY DOES OMA HAMOU EXHIBIT SUCH DOGGED REFUSAL TO ANSWER SIMPLE QUESTIONS?
So is Oma Hamou's refusal to answer these basic questions evidence to find Oma Hamou genuinely credible when it comes to anything she says?
The Oma Hamou Reality: Oma Hamou responded to our statement Oma Hamou's attorneys of Record, Foster Malish & Blair withdrew their representation of Oma Hamou during this litigation after showing the Court that Hamou had failed to pay them almost $20,000 in legal fees she had accrued and that she also failed to pay the retainer fee she had promised to pay them when they undertook representation. Again, the documentation from these attorneys show numerous promises to pay, which Hamou failed to keep." by saying:
"I paid the law firm Foster, Malich (sic) & Blair its requested retainer fee".
Begs the question doesn't it? Notice how she wants you to think she paid her bill? The Oma Hamou Reality is AFTER using up her retainer, she accrued $20,000 in more bills which she never paid and as a result Foster Malish & Blair asked the court to allow them to withdraw as her attorneys.
So, does Oma Hamou's subtle linguistic ommissions and twisting really give Oma Hamou any credibility to anything she says?
The Oma Hamou Reality: Oma Hamou responded to our statement Hamou also wrote bad checks on the same closed account to Wild West Productions, the director, and others involved in making the "trailer". by saying:
"I was the director at this specific shoot. I have never issued a check to “Wild West Productions”." See, we got the name wrong of the studio. Oma Hamou wrote checks on a long closed account to Monique Hahn, the make up artist, the studio where the shoot took place AND the Director of the shoot. Notice she puts the name in quotes, the reality is that she DID issue a bad check to the studio at that specific shoot, but tap dances around that reality.
So, does Oma Hamou's subtle linguistic ommissions and twisting really give Oma Hamou any credibility to anything she says?
I mean, come on. You can do your own research into the public record for yourself, I encourage it. Oma Hamou, on the other hand, offers up only her own, self-serving "Its true because I said so and you HAVE to believe ME because I'm a poor victim" statements.
Judge for yourself what's CREDIBLE.
It's about credibility, stupid!
Updated December 6, 2006
(Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.0.1):
it's
1. contraction of it is)
The Oma Hamou Reality: Oma Hamou writes virtually nothing under her own name. Three "blogs" now appear with no purpose other than to repeat the same stuff over and over and over and over and over between them. ALL of them quoting "Mike Newson" or "Justin Edwards" or anybody EXCEPT Oma Hamou. There, of course, is no verification of WHO these people are, other than their "I am who I say I am, but won't give you any genuine proof."
So is that really, genuinely credible when it comes to any information about Oma Hamou?
We decided to examine the credibilty of Mike Newson, just in case he "is" real:
http://whoismikenewson.blogspot.com/
The Oma Hamou Reality: Whenever anyone questions Oma Hamou's background, statements, credentials, references, contacts, history or her own self published bio, she starts ranting on and on and on and on and on and on ad nauseum about this Bob Atchison guy. There is precious little actually out there about Oma Hamou, so why does she scream on and on about somebody else when the GENUINE FOCUS is Oma Hamou?
So is any of that really, genuinely credible when it comes to any information about Oma Hamou?
The Oma Hamou Reality: Oma Hamou says she is a busy Motion Picture Producer. Oma Hamou has no offices, no business address other than a cheap Pak n Mail PO box drop, no business telephone and no Federal or California Employer ID numbers (required to actually have the "employees" she says she has). Oma Hamou SAID she had offices in Russia, in the town of Pushkin and published an adddress to make it appear she HAD Russian offices. The Oma Hamou reality was that the building was then and still is a vacant ruin. The Orthodox Church which owns the building had given Oma Hamou an agreement six years ago that IF she restored the building, THEN she could use it for offices. The Oma Hamou Reality is that since she did NOTHING to restore the building in the last six years, she has never had offices there.
So is any of what little Oma Hamou DOES say about her business really, genuinely credible when it comes to any of the alleged information about Oma Hamou or her business she publishes?
The Oma Hamou Reality: Oma Hamou writes almost daily that she is nothing but a "victim" in her life. First her abusive father, then abusive husband, then psychotic stalker Bob Atchison. She was "forced" to commit felonies, she was "conned" into amassing huge judgments against her and substantial debt. Dunn & Bradstreet has a report with Oma Hamou's NAME and information all over it, which was proven by them to be essentially all lies, but Oma Hamou says "Someone ELSE forged the Dunn & Bradstreet report". Come on, When does Oma Hamou take ANY GENUINE RESPONSIBILITY FOR HER ACTIONS AND HER LIFE? Interestingly, never it appears.
So is any of what little Oma Hamou DOES say is it really, genuinely credible?
The Oma Hamou Reality: Oma Hamou insists that anything negative that anyone anywhere EVER says about her MUST be at the beck and call and direction of that Bob Atchison fellow. "We" must be Bob Atchison...there was a fellow on a website calling himself "Vapors", they said HE was Bob Atchison too...until Vapors proved he wasn't...THEN they said he MUST be part of the conspiracy...I mean, this Atchison guy is made out to be Dr. Evil reaching out and influencing governmental agencies, the FBI, police departments across the country, banks, studios, etc etc. . All the people who say bad things about Oma Hamou MUST be part of the conspiracy JUST BECAUSE they come up with the same information. Think about that for just one second. Maybe, just MAYBE, different people come up with the same story about Oma Hamou because the stuff they come up with is the truth.
So is any of this vast conspiracy theory really something to support Oma Hamou and find her genuinely credible when it comes to anything she says?
The Oma Hamou Reality: Oma Hamou is a convicted felon. Does it really MATTER if it is the five felonies that different people all seem to have found in the records OR the three felony convictions Hamou does fess up to ? The Oma Hamou Reality is that this chick committed crimes of Theft by Deception, Fraud, and Passing Bad Checks. Further, she failed to live up to the Court Ordered Terms of her Probation and was arrested Three MORE times as a Felony Fugitive From Justice. Oma Hamou says that it was "just one bad check" that "SOMEHOW" ends up creating three felonies in three states. Some magic check, huh? Oma Hamou says "hey EVERYBODY has a bounced check in their past. True enough, me included HOWEVER SHE OVERLOOKS THE FACT THAT 99.99% OF PEOPLE AREN'T CONVICTED OF FELONIES AS A RESULT.
So is this background helpful to find anything Oma Hamou says to be genuinely credible when it comes to any information about Oma Hamou?
The Oma Hamou Reality: Oma Hamou steadfastly and stubbornly refuses to provide specific information about her career as an actress, model and her experience sufficient to make her a real Motion Picture Producer. THE SIXTY FOUR THOUSAND DOLLAR QUESTION IS WHY DOES OMA HAMOU EXHIBIT SUCH DOGGED REFUSAL TO ANSWER SIMPLE QUESTIONS?
So is Oma Hamou's refusal to answer these basic questions evidence to find Oma Hamou genuinely credible when it comes to anything she says?
The Oma Hamou Reality: Oma Hamou responded to our statement Oma Hamou's attorneys of Record, Foster Malish & Blair withdrew their representation of Oma Hamou during this litigation after showing the Court that Hamou had failed to pay them almost $20,000 in legal fees she had accrued and that she also failed to pay the retainer fee she had promised to pay them when they undertook representation. Again, the documentation from these attorneys show numerous promises to pay, which Hamou failed to keep." by saying:
"I paid the law firm Foster, Malich (sic) & Blair its requested retainer fee".
Begs the question doesn't it? Notice how she wants you to think she paid her bill? The Oma Hamou Reality is AFTER using up her retainer, she accrued $20,000 in more bills which she never paid and as a result Foster Malish & Blair asked the court to allow them to withdraw as her attorneys.
So, does Oma Hamou's subtle linguistic ommissions and twisting really give Oma Hamou any credibility to anything she says?
The Oma Hamou Reality: Oma Hamou responded to our statement Hamou also wrote bad checks on the same closed account to Wild West Productions, the director, and others involved in making the "trailer". by saying:
"I was the director at this specific shoot. I have never issued a check to “Wild West Productions”." See, we got the name wrong of the studio. Oma Hamou wrote checks on a long closed account to Monique Hahn, the make up artist, the studio where the shoot took place AND the Director of the shoot. Notice she puts the name in quotes, the reality is that she DID issue a bad check to the studio at that specific shoot, but tap dances around that reality.
So, does Oma Hamou's subtle linguistic ommissions and twisting really give Oma Hamou any credibility to anything she says?
I mean, come on. You can do your own research into the public record for yourself, I encourage it. Oma Hamou, on the other hand, offers up only her own, self-serving "Its true because I said so and you HAVE to believe ME because I'm a poor victim" statements.
Judge for yourself what's CREDIBLE.
posted by Watchtower at 10:54 AM
<< Home