Tuesday, October 19, 2010

The 2010 Reality Update! Lots of new info..

All the stuff about our dear Mizz Thang gets tedious and hard to follow. SOOO kiddies, here is a condensed version of what the public record and her own admissions on the net show about the REALITY of MizzThangWannabeebutNEVAHWuz Oma Hamou aka Alexandra McConnell aka Oma Demian aka Oma Ashkenazy aka Alexandra Hamou aka Oma Chedid aka Rebecca Jordan aka Jordan Taylor:

JUST THIS YEAR:

Case Number: MC020860
 HAMID REFAI VS ALEXANDRA MCCONNELL, JIM SPROUL, ET AL
Filing Date: 09/23/2009
According to the case, Mr. Refai, a married man, was "involved" with Alexandra McConnell, she kept telling him about serious "medical problems" and asking for "loans" for medical bills in the total amount of $51,000. He had her sign a promissory note, co signed by long time co-conspirator Jim Sproul. She of course never PAID back the money. She, of course, never showed up in Court.


Case Number: 10U01290
 COWAN, ERIC VS. HAMOU, OMA
Filing Date: 05/05/2010 
Case Type: U.D.- RESIDENTIAL (Limited Jurisdiction)
Filing Court: Michael Antonovich Antelope Valley Courthouse
Status: DISPOSED BY JUDGMENT.
Not only was she evicted for not paying rent, she wrote a BAD CHECK to the LA Superior court:
07/22/2010 `NSF` CHECK RECEIVED FOR FILING FEES AND MOTION FEE ,
(HAMOU, OMA) AKA(MCCONNELL, ALEXANDRA) AKA (DEMIAN, OME)
AKA (ASHKENAZY, OMA) AKA (HAMOU, ALEXANDRA) AKA(CHEDID,
OMA) AKA (JORDAN, REBECCA) AKA (TAYLOR, JORDAN) AKA
(ABRAMOV, OMA) NOTIFIED BY MAIL PER SECTION C.C.P.
411.20. PAYMENT DUE BY 08/16/10 , IN THE SUM OF $
310.00 . CLERK'S NOTICE OF FILING FEES REQUIRED &
CERTIFICATE OF MAILING FILED.


VERY INTERESTING STORY HERE:
Oma Hamou sought to rent a house from Eric Cowan. She signed the contract as Alexandra McConnell but presented as her ID an expired California driver’s license in the name of Oma Hamou. Hamou explained to Mr. Cowan that she had to use an alias because she was being stalked on the internet.

Hamou was driven around by a very large woman, whom she introduced as her assistant. (This is the woman known as “Debbie” who drives a vehicle owned by Advanced Paralegal Services.)(When they say large they mean like this:


Hamou moved into the house with a roommate, one Steve Lee, in whose name the utilities were obtained. She paid two months deposit and the first month’s rent. Over the course of her eight-month occupancy, only one other rent payment was made. The current balance due is $9,600.

As she began to fall behind in rent payments, Hamou told Mr. Cowan she had developed rectal cancer. She often professed to be in the hospital, usually coinciding with the rent’s coming due.

When pressed hard for rent, she resorted to fraudulent checks. One was a check on a closed Florida business account drawn against Reseda Glass (the company associated with Jim Sproul, her associate in the recent scam against Hamid Refai). Another was a bounced check which Hamou fraudulently altered for the first eviction hearing.

Hamou appeared at that hearing with a copy of a rent check which she claimed was good and on which the bank’s “NSF” stamp had been whited out. Hamou insisted she thought the check had cleared. As it happened, Mr. Cowan had the original check at the hearing, with the “NSF” stamp clearly visible. The judge was rather annoyed and gave Hamou one hour either to get to the bank for proof the check had cleared or to bring back her bank statement showing the check had been paid. She returned an hour later, saying that the bank manager told her the bank had made a “mistake” in telling her the check had cleared.

Hamou failed to appear at subsequent eviction hearings.

Hamou had over 40 cats in the house, to the point that the landlord notified Animal Control. The house was left in “unliveable” condition, with every room covered in “every cat fluid imaginable” and with an overpowering stench. The estimate for repairs to make the house suitable again for habitation is $15,000.



KNOWN Arrests
:
November 7, 2008: Case FVI802540 Defendant 3045972 MCCONNELL, ALEXANDRA OMA in San Bernardino County for FELONY FORGERY.PC 476 F MAKING, POSSESSING, UTTERING FICTIOUS INSTRS 11/07/2008. Preliminary Trial scheduled for September 10, 2009. Oma Hamou using the aka Alexandra Oma McConnell paid for rent on a house in Victorville California with a bad check and arrested as a result. Initial bail set at ONE MILLION DOLLARS. She paid "VICTIM RESTITITION" and charges were dismissed.

June 25, 1991 – Oma Demian is arrested in the State of Utah for NSF Check and is released on a $20,000 bond.

August 27, 1991 - Oma Demian is arrested by the Los Angeles Police Department on a warrant for failing to appear in Utah and fights extradition. The State of Montana places her child in "protective custody"

March 26, 1993: Per Billings PD, Oma Ashkenazy arrested for writing fraudulent checks in Wyoming in 1991-92. Subsequent to arrest, it was discovered her real name was Oma Demian

November 14, 1995; Oma Hamou was arrested by the Los Angeles Police Department "in violation of California Penal Code 1551.1" as "A Fugitive From Justice" on a Felony Probation Violation Conviction from Summit County, Utah filed against her a full year earlier. She was held without bail in custody in Jail in Los Angeles for three weeks, until December 5, 1995, when she was extradited to Utah on the Felony "no bail" warrant. She paid the required restitution in Utah and was released.

July 9, 1997: According to the San Diego Sherrif's office, Oma Hamou was arrested again in San Diego as a Felony Fugitive from Justice for violation of her Montana probation. San Diego Case CD129280. She was jailed for one month until extradited back to Yellowstone County, Billings, Montana on August 15. She paid the required restitution in Montana and was released.

August 1, 2000: Oma Hamou was also arrested again by the Los Angeles Police Department on August 1, 2000 as "A Felony Fugitive From Justice, from Park County Wyoming" in violation of California Penal Code 1551.1". Case number BA205463. She was tried in front of Judge Christina Hill, present in Court and represented by John Alan. She was released in the interest of Justice as Wyoming refused to extradite her at that time as she paid the required restitution of $4,043.95

Convictions on Public Record:
November 7,1991 "Oma McConnell" (aka Oma Demian) was convicted in the State of Utah, Park City District Court, Utah Administrative Office of the Courts case number 2218-911613381, of the 2nd degree Felony crime of "Theft By Deception" in violation of Utah Criminal Statue 76-6-405, and a disposition of "Guilty" has been entered in that Court for this crime.


January 13, 1992: Oma Demain (aka Oma Ashkenazy Demian, Oma McConnell and Oma Ashkenazy) Convicted of 2nd Degree Felony Crime "Theft by Deception" and recieved a 36 month suspended sentence in Coalville District of Utah.
Debts:

April 1, 1992: Oma Demian convicted of the Felony offense of Issuing a bad check over $150 was sentenced to 120 months in Prison, sentence suspended. Case 91-103, in Billings,Yellowstone County Montana, for the fraudulent checks issued in 1991.

March 31, 1993. Per Montana DoC, Oma Demian plead guilty in Wyoming to the Felony offense of issuing fraudulent checks in Wyoming and received a 120 month suspended sentence.

BENCH WARRANT OUTSTANDING FOR
:

Name: HAMOU , OMA

Case Number LAX7WA02012-01
Filed At Airport Courthouse
Filing Date 06/29/2007
Limited Jurisdiction
Count Charge Code Charge Description**
01 12500(A) VC UNLICENSED DRIVER
*
02 16028(A) VC NO PROOF OF CAR INSURANCE
*
03 4000(A) VC REGISTRATION REQUIRED *


KNOWN Debts:
May 21, 2002: Judgment in the amount of $213,805 was awarded on May 21, 2002 against Oma Hamou in favor of Boardrush, LLC. by the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York by the Hon. Richard. F. Braun in Index No. 01/605021 for a Default Judgment against Oma Hamou, and was filed with the Clerk's office on June 11, 2002

October 24, 2002: Writs of Execution for Judgments in Case PC027665 in Los Angeles County Superior Court were granted for American Express Travel Related Services, to execute judgments for unpaid American Express Credit Card charges, against Enigma Royal Films, LLC, in the amount of $190,006 and $82,012; against Oma Hamou in the amount of $127,155, and William Donald Morton in the amount of $15,882. William Donald Morton was the owner of Oma Hamou's Mayall Street residence, and resided there as well himself.

June 23, 2003: UCC Judgment lien was filed by NTT/Verio Inc. in California, filing no. 0317860421 against Enigma Films, securing Judgment against Enigma Films in the amount of $61,000. Oma Hamou the convicted FELON had engaged NTT/Verio to design a website for Enigma Films, but never paid for the work.

July 28, 2003 Reed Business Information files a lawsuit in New York Supreme Court, no. 03112486 against Oma Hamou dba Enigma films in the amount of $112,179 for unpaid advertising in their magazines in 2002. They are unable to have Oma Hamou served with the lawsuit as she appears to have avoided all attempts at service of process for this lawsuit.

August 5, 2003: WESTAR LEGAL ENTERPRISES, LLC. v. OMA HAMOU ET AL. Los Angeles County Superior Court Case PC033237, Breach of Contract, filed 08/05/2003, Default Judgment issued against Oma Hamou individually and dba Engima Productions for the suit originally filed on 04/23/2004 for an as yet unknown amount in excess of $10,000

Sept. 26, 2003 : FREEMAN FREEMAN & SMILEY LLP v. OMA HAMOU. LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT, West Los Angeles Case 03T02636, Breach of Contract, lawsuit filed.

December 26, 2003: Global Insight,(Usa) Inc. vs. Enigma Films Inc., Sarskaia Foundation. Los Angeles Superior Court, case SC078588. Default judgment issued against Enigma Films and Sarskaia, for a debt collection case "in excess of $60,000" according to Plaintiff's attorney Jacqueline Anker. Global Insight produced the "Economic Impact Statement" for her motion picture project which Hamou/Sarskaia made available as a PDF on her websites, until Global Insight demanded she cease using this report.

Feb. 2, 2004: Default Judgment against Oma Hamou issued in favor of Freeman Freeman & Smiley LLP for an unknown amount in excess of $10,000.

May 19, 2004: suit was filed in Los Angeles Municipal Court, Beverly Hills Division, against Oma Hamou and Enigma Films: HAHN, MONIQUE vs OMA HAMOU/ENIGMA FILMS, Case number 04S00922 Case Type:Small ClaimsDate Filed:05/19/2004 Status: Active Prayer Amount:$800.00 Parties Attorneys HAHN, MONIQUE (Plaintiff) LOS ANGELES, CA 90039 OMA HAMOU/ENIMGA FILMS (Defendant). Oma Hamou issued a check on a long closed (two years) bank account to Miss Hahn who provided professional makeup service for a "trailer" Oma Hamou produced. Oma Hamou the convicted FELON never showed up at this trial and default judment was issued against her. Checks on the same closed account were also written that same day to Wild West Media 17522 Von Karman Ave. Irvine, CA. 92614

September 27, 2005 :Robert Atchison v. Oma Hamou, cause GN303141, 345th District Court of the State of Texas. After trial a jury found in favor of Bob Atchison for services he rendered on behalf of Hamou in the year 2000 and for which she never paid him in the amount of $13,859.99 plus interest. The final judgment was filed October 11, 2005.
- Oma Hamou acknowledges on the internet that she still owes her Austin Texas attorneys Foster, Malish, Blair & Cowan in excess of $20,000 for legal fees related to this lawsuit, which was the basis for their withdrawl.




Lots of other information is on a blog published by one of her victims, Rob Moshein... http://www.RobMosheinSpeaksOut.blogspot.com

Thursday, August 06, 2009

Oma Hamou aka Oma McConnell. Reality in a Nutshell

All the stuff about our dear Mizz Thang gets tedious and hard to follow. SOOO kiddies, here is a condensed version of what the public record and her own admissions on the net show about the REALITY of MizzThangWannabeebutNEVAHWuz Oma Hamou aka Alexandra McConnell aka Oma Demian aka Oma Ashkenazy aka Alexandra Hamou aka Oma Chedid aka Rebecca Jordan aka Jordan Taylor:


KNOWN Arrests
:
November 7, 2008: Case FVI802540 Defendant 3045972 MCCONNELL, ALEXANDRA OMA in San Bernardino County for FELONY FORGERY.PC 476 F MAKING, POSSESSING, UTTERING FICTIOUS INSTRS 11/07/2008. Preliminary Trial scheduled for September 10, 2009. Oma Hamou using the aka Alexandra Oma McConnell paid for rent on a house in Victorville California with a bad check and arrested as a result. Initial bail set at ONE MILLION DOLLARS. She is currently out on $25,000 bail.

June 25, 1991 – Oma Demian is arrested in the State of Utah for NSF Check and is released on a $20,000 bond.

August 27, 1991 - Oma Demian is arrested by the Los Angeles Police Department on a warrant for failing to appear in Utah and fights extradition. The State of Montana places her child in "protective custody"

March 26, 1993: Per Billings PD, Oma Ashkenazy arrested for writing fraudulent checks in Wyoming in 1991-92. Subsequent to arrest, it was discovered her real name was Oma Demian

November 14, 1995; Oma Hamou was arrested by the Los Angeles Police Department "in violation of California Penal Code 1551.1" as "A Fugitive From Justice" on a Felony Probation Violation Conviction from Summit County, Utah filed against her a full year earlier. She was held without bail in custody in Jail in Los Angeles for three weeks, until December 5, 1995, when she was extradited to Utah on the Felony "no bail" warrant. She paid the required restitution in Utah and was released.

July 9, 1997: According to the San Diego Sherrif's office, Oma Hamou was arrested again in San Diego as a Felony Fugitive from Justice for violation of her Montana probation. San Diego Case CD129280. She was jailed for one month until extradited back to Yellowstone County, Billings, Montana on August 15. She paid the required restitution in Montana and was released.

August 1, 2000: Oma Hamou was also arrested again by the Los Angeles Police Department on August 1, 2000 as "A Felony Fugitive From Justice, from Park County Wyoming" in violation of California Penal Code 1551.1". Case number BA205463. She was tried in front of Judge Christina Hill, present in Court and represented by John Alan. She was released in the interest of Justice as Wyoming refused to extradite her at that time as she paid the required restitution of $4,043.95

Convictions on Public Record:
November 7,1991 "Oma McConnell" (aka Oma Demian) was convicted in the State of Utah, Park City District Court, Utah Administrative Office of the Courts case number 2218-911613381, of the 2nd degree Felony crime of "Theft By Deception" in violation of Utah Criminal Statue 76-6-405, and a disposition of "Guilty" has been entered in that Court for this crime.


January 13, 1992: Oma Demain (aka Oma Ashkenazy Demian, Oma McConnell and Oma Ashkenazy) Convicted of 2nd Degree Felony Crime "Theft by Deception" and recieved a 36 month suspended sentence in Coalville District of Utah.
Debts:

April 1, 1992: Oma Demian convicted of the Felony offense of Issuing a bad check over $150 was sentenced to 120 months in Prison, sentence suspended. Case 91-103, in Billings,Yellowstone County Montana, for the fraudulent checks issued in 1991.

March 31, 1993. Per Montana DoC, Oma Demian plead guilty in Wyoming to the Felony offense of issuing fraudulent checks in Wyoming and received a 120 month suspended sentence.

BENCH WARRANT OUTSTANDING FOR
:

Name: HAMOU , OMA

Case Number LAX7WA02012-01
Filed At Airport Courthouse
Filing Date 06/29/2007
Limited Jurisdiction
Count Charge Code Charge Description**
01 12500(A) VC UNLICENSED DRIVER
*
02 16028(A) VC NO PROOF OF CAR INSURANCE
*
03 4000(A) VC REGISTRATION REQUIRED *


KNOWN Debts:
May 21, 2002: Judgment in the amount of $213,805 was awarded on May 21, 2002 against Oma Hamou in favor of Boardrush, LLC. by the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York by the Hon. Richard. F. Braun in Index No. 01/605021 for a Default Judgment against Oma Hamou, and was filed with the Clerk's office on June 11, 2002

October 24, 2002: Writs of Execution for Judgments in Case PC027665 in Los Angeles County Superior Court were granted for American Express Travel Related Services, to execute judgments for unpaid American Express Credit Card charges, against Enigma Royal Films, LLC, in the amount of $190,006 and $82,012; against Oma Hamou in the amount of $127,155, and William Donald Morton in the amount of $15,882. William Donald Morton was the owner of Oma Hamou's Mayall Street residence, and resided there as well himself.

June 23, 2003: UCC Judgment lien was filed by NTT/Verio Inc. in California, filing no. 0317860421 against Enigma Films, securing Judgment against Enigma Films in the amount of $61,000. Oma Hamou the convicted FELON had engaged NTT/Verio to design a website for Enigma Films, but never paid for the work.

July 28, 2003 Reed Business Information files a lawsuit in New York Supreme Court, no. 03112486 against Oma Hamou dba Enigma films in the amount of $112,179 for unpaid advertising in their magazines in 2002. They are unable to have Oma Hamou served with the lawsuit as she appears to have avoided all attempts at service of process for this lawsuit.

August 5, 2003: WESTAR LEGAL ENTERPRISES, LLC. v. OMA HAMOU ET AL. Los Angeles County Superior Court Case PC033237, Breach of Contract, filed 08/05/2003, Default Judgment issued against Oma Hamou individually and dba Engima Productions for the suit originally filed on 04/23/2004 for an as yet unknown amount in excess of $10,000

Sept. 26, 2003 : FREEMAN FREEMAN & SMILEY LLP v. OMA HAMOU. LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT, West Los Angeles Case 03T02636, Breach of Contract, lawsuit filed.

December 26, 2003: Global Insight,(Usa) Inc. vs. Enigma Films Inc., Sarskaia Foundation. Los Angeles Superior Court, case SC078588. Default judgment issued against Enigma Films and Sarskaia, for a debt collection case "in excess of $60,000" according to Plaintiff's attorney Jacqueline Anker. Global Insight produced the "Economic Impact Statement" for her motion picture project which Hamou/Sarskaia made available as a PDF on her websites, until Global Insight demanded she cease using this report.

Feb. 2, 2004: Default Judgment against Oma Hamou issued in favor of Freeman Freeman & Smiley LLP for an unknown amount in excess of $10,000.

May 19, 2004: suit was filed in Los Angeles Municipal Court, Beverly Hills Division, against Oma Hamou and Enigma Films: HAHN, MONIQUE vs OMA HAMOU/ENIGMA FILMS, Case number 04S00922 Case Type:Small ClaimsDate Filed:05/19/2004 Status: Active Prayer Amount:$800.00 Parties Attorneys HAHN, MONIQUE (Plaintiff) LOS ANGELES, CA 90039 OMA HAMOU/ENIMGA FILMS (Defendant). Oma Hamou issued a check on a long closed (two years) bank account to Miss Hahn who provided professional makeup service for a "trailer" Oma Hamou produced. Oma Hamou the convicted FELON never showed up at this trial and default judment was issued against her. Checks on the same closed account were also written that same day to Wild West Media 17522 Von Karman Ave. Irvine, CA. 92614

September 27, 2005 :Robert Atchison v. Oma Hamou, cause GN303141, 345th District Court of the State of Texas. After trial a jury found in favor of Bob Atchison for services he rendered on behalf of Hamou in the year 2000 and for which she never paid him in the amount of $13,859.99 plus interest. The final judgment was filed October 11, 2005.
- Oma Hamou acknowledges on the internet that she still owes her Austin Texas attorneys Foster, Malish, Blair & Cowan in excess of $20,000 for legal fees related to this lawsuit, which was the basis for their withdrawl.

Lots of other information is on a blog published by one of her victims, Rob Moshein... http://www.RobMosheinSpeaksOut.blogspot.com

Labels: , ,

Friday, July 31, 2009

Oma Hamou LIES AGAIN!

Just today Oma Hamou (aka Alexandra McConnell the name she was arrested for a FELONY FORGERY Charge on last November and faces trial in September and also aka Alexandra Hamou LIED BLATANTLY again today on another Blog we follow closely.

Oma, using the Justin sockpuppet said:

Please really look at the Restraining Application because it lists Pallasart and Rob Moshein. It was granted with a $1,000 bond and a court hearing was scheduled for Feb. 14, 2004.

Well Mr. Moshein gladly posted that document and here it is:



CLEARLY company Pallasart is not mentioned anywhere.

OOPS, you been busted Oma Hamou aka Alexandra McConnell better known as MizzTHANG nevawuzwannabee chicka.

Friday, July 24, 2009

Anatomy of a Con: The Oma Hamou Story

The following was sent to us. We thought it was well written and of interest to the subject.

WE DID NOT WRITE THIS PIECE. WE CAN NOT GUARANTEE THAT IT IS THE TRUTH. You are free to decide for yourself what you believe.

***

Anatomy of a Con:

The Oma Hamou Story


On November 2, 2008 a woman named Alexandra Oma McConnell was arrested in San Bernardino County, California for felony forgery. For the next six weeks Ms. McConnell, who was also living as Alexandra Murphy, sat in jail with bail set at one million dollars. Today she is in pre-trial proceedings on that felony charge.

Over the years, Ms. McConnell has gone by many names, including Oma Demian, Oma Ashkenazy, Oma Chedid, Rebecca Taylor, Taylor Jordan, and variants. But the name she most preferred – and the name under which this story unfolds – is Oma Hamou.

This is the story of a grifter, but a grifter with a twist. While most grifters run their confidence games simply as a means to live, Oma Hamou had dreams. She was going to be a movie star, a film producer, an international business executive, and a woman to whom powerful men would turn to pour out their hearts and open their wallets. She was going to Hollywood.

This is not the first time this tale has been told about Hollywood. And it is not the first time the tale has been infused with deep psychosis. But it is perhaps the first time the psychosis has been manifested as a fantasy about a defunct royal dynasty, where the antagonist dresses herself in imperial regalia, where she takes the name of a dead empress, where she posts on the internet her fantasies of being a reincarnated Romanov – and where she actually dwells so deep inside the fantasy that she will risk prison in increasingly desperate attempts to maintain her own distorted reality, heedless of the cost to a long roster of victims.

Oma Hamou was born as Oma Louise McConnell on August 1, 1963 in Charleston, West Virginia. Little is known of her early years, other than hints of some sort of domestic abuse she claimed as a young girl. She first showed up in the public record as Oma McConnell when she was apprehended in 1983 in Los Angeles while posing as a catering employee to gain entry to a reception Nancy Reagan was giving for Queen Elizabeth. This was the first sign of Oma Hamou’s pathological obsession with royalty, the obsession around which the tale of this grift will unfold.

The next few years are somewhat hazy, as she lived and worked under various names. That period did produce a series of soft-core pornography shots of her in various states of undress and provocative poses which even today, some twenty-plus years later, she continues to post on the internet. At only 5’0” and with a rather extreme jaw line, she remained on the periphery of the “art” industry, using her work there primarily as the basis for future claims that she was a professional model and film actress. Over the years, even though she trumpets her modeling and film work in a series of self-promoting internet sites, she has steadfastly refused to furnish actual film or modeling credits.

The early 1990’s were somewhat rough for Oma. The bloom was off the lily for work in the “art” industry, and she had to find another means of support. She became the tenth wife of a much older man, and the marriage ended in fireworks as Oma accumulated a string of felony convictions for passing bad checks that her husband would not honor, and she then accused her husband of child molestation. Fleeing the terms of her probation, she several times found herself in jail awaiting extradition and probation violation hearings.

By the late 1990’s, Oma had dusted herself off and moved into the home of another very elderly and rather senile man. This time she fared somewhat better, finding that the man had significant assets she could access by forging his name on checks and opening credit accounts in his name. With access to these funds, she could at last begin the grift to fund her fantasy in earnest. So she began to assemble the pieces of the marketing façade she would use to bill herself as a well-connected, heavily-funded film impresario about to produce a major film on the final years of Russia’s Romanov dynasty. She, of course, would star in the film as Her Imperial Majesty, the Empress Alexandra.

The first step was to have a script at hand for the movie project. She embezzled funds from her elderly housemate’s business accounts to pay a writer to produce a script for the movie, entitled A Matter of Honour. (When the old gentleman’s family found out about the theft, they contacted the Elder Abuse Unit of the Los Angeles Police Department, which determined a scam was underway but could not be prosecuted because the primary witness was too senile to be an effective witness.)

To establish her credentials as a businesswoman, Ms. Hamou contracted with Global Insight to produce an economic impact report. Using data and assumptions fed to them by Ms. Hamou, this report calculated an economic value to the Russian economy of tens of millions of dollars deriving from the major motion picture Ms. Hamou was going to film on the outskirts of St. Petersburg. (Global Insight eventually sued Ms. Hamou for non-payment of the $60,000 she owed them for this report, and they demanded that she cease to use it in promoting her project. She continued to publish the report on the internet. The judgment in favor of Global Insight has never been paid.)

She then provided Dunn & Bradstreet with a series of fabricated facts about a film company with one hundred employees, a large production facility, and serious financial backing. Dunn & Bradstreet dutifully issued a listing reflecting these claims. (Dunn & Bradstreet eventually discovered that the data had been fabricated and rescinded its rating of Ms. Hamou’s faked enterprise. In fact, Oma Hamou did hire several people for a short period of time. She used their social security numbers to obtain personal American Express credit cards in their names – but she had the billing sent to her – and she promptly ran up around $400,000 in charges. American Express sued her, the elderly gentleman, and two of her “employees”. The two “employees” were later dropped from the judgment, as they were able to prove they were unaware of the charges placed in their names. The elderly gentleman was held liable, as Ms. Hamou was living with him and used his address to obtain the cards. The American Express judgment has never been paid.)

Ms. Hamou then had herself photographed in full costume as the Empress Alexandra and purchased a series of full-page ads in the entertainment industry newspaper Variety. (The publisher of Variety eventually sued Ms. Hamou for failing to pay for these ads. That judgment has never been paid.)

She also created a sham charity, called the Sarskaia Foundation, of which she appointed herself Chairwoman and which put itself forward on the internet as an organization that channeled large funds to Russia for the restoration of its imperial architectural heritage. (The phone number of the charity rang to a community bank in Los Angeles which had never heard of the Sarskaia Foundation or of its Chairwoman Oma Hamou.)

She wrote a self-promoting article about herself, discussing her many business ventures, her world travels, her grand movie project, and her associations with powerful politicians and churchmen in Russia and the United States. (She claimed the article was authored by a journalist named Nitzana Kedem. While she perhaps thought it clever to use a Jewish-sounding name when trying to promote herself to the film industry, the name Nitzana Kedem was actually an amalgam of an Israeli grocery store chain and a campaign of the 1967 Arab-Israeli war.)

The final stage was to produce a trailer for the movie. Knowing that nothing sells film like film, Ms. Hamou contracted for sound stages, for costuming and hairdressing, and for other associated services. (Checks were written on a closed bank account, lawsuits proceeded, and the Irvine, California Police were eventually called in. Ms. Hamou lost the lawsuits, never paid the judgments, and only avoided prosecution for the bad checks by making good on the debt to Wild West Productions, which was to produce the trailer.)

The ducks were now all in a row to move on to the next stage of the scam. Ms. Hamou contacted a man named Robert Atchison and put him under contract for $7,000 a month to be her chief consultant on the film project. Mr. Atchison was a recognized specialist on Russia’s last tsar, Nicholas II, and he owned the largest and most heavily-visited history site on the internet: “The Alexander Palace”, named for the principal residence of the last tsar.

Mr. Atchison had broad and deep connections in Russia with authorities charged with the preservation and development of the former imperial complex in Pushkin, Russia, as well as with senior people in the Russian Orthodox Church. Ms. Hamou asked to be introduced to these people, which Mr. Atchison did.

Ms. Hamou promptly set her plan in motion. She hired a Russian public relations firm, provided them with the faked Global Insight economic impact report, the fraudulently-obtained Dunn & Bradstreet rating, the unpaid ad coverage from Variety, the movie script paid for with stolen funds, and other faked credentials. Backed by these proofs of her considerable financial means and her intent to do great things for the advancement of Russian imperial history, the public relations firm succeeded in getting Ms. Hamou considerable print and television coverage in St. Petersburg and elsewhere in Russia.

To reinforce the façade that she was a major new player on the scene of Romanov history, Ms. Hamou claimed to have a sixty-million-dollar “trust fund” at hand to finance her film project and to fund the restoration of the Feodorovsky Cathedral and the Alexander Palace, which would be used as sets for her motion picture epic. The Russians, both desperate for funds to halt the decay of their beloved monuments and somewhat naïve about western business practices, took her at her word. Both the Feodorovsky Cathedral and the Alexander Palace hired work crews and began repairs on the promise from Ms. Hamou that funds would be placed at their disposal immediately.

And here the façade hiding Ms. Hamou’s private pathological fantasy of a personal connection to royalty and her desperate desire to be a movie star and film producer began to fall apart. There were, of course, no funds behind any of the promises. And bills – real, live bills – were coming due.

Ms. Hamou’s first impulse was to attempt to buy time. She was beset by a string of sudden illnesses, car accidents, misdirected mail, just-missed calls, bank mistakes, and personal emergencies of friends and family. As people who had incurred their own liabilities in reliance on her promises began to suspect they had been scammed, they turned to Mr. Atchison, their friend and the man who had brought Oma Hamou into their lives.

Mr. Atchison, in an attempt to protect his reputation and to make amends to victims where he could, began to warn his associates of Ms. Hamou’s fraudulent activities. Ms. Hamou responded with fusillades of attacks on Mr. Atchison, calling his customers, launching internet attacks on him, and otherwise claiming he was defaming her. In an attempt to procure payment for his own services, he sued Ms. Hamou and won the case by jury verdict.

Ms. Hamou has been sued approximately a dozen times and has lost every suit. In most cases, she never bothered to show for trial, knowing she had neither means nor intent to pay any judgment. Where she found trial unavoidable, she worked through lawyers, absenting herself from the courtroom as often as possible with claims of recurrent illness or accident. (Two of her lawyers have sued their own client for non-payment for their services.)

In almost every case, Ms. Hamou has ignored the judgment against her and moved on with her life and scams. But the lawsuit by Mr. Atchison was another matter. This was a man who occupied the position she desperately craved – to be recognized as an authority on late Romanov history and as the chief American advocate of the restoration of the dynasty’s last residence. She could tolerate lawsuits by others with equanimity. But to have Mr. Atchison – the man who had turned on her when her scam in Pushkin imperiled his own reputation – sue her was just not to be borne. So she traveled to Texas, where she personally but unsuccessfully defended the lawsuit.

Coming off that loss, she embarked on an unrelenting, psychologically unhinged, and defamatory campaign to do anything she could to strike at someone she perceives as the most mortal of enemies: the man who unmasked her psychotic fantasy as the scam it was from the very beginning.

Even today, as she awaits trial on yet another felony charge that could well send her to prison, she spends her time launching website after website attacking Mr. Atchison and his associates. Her life continues to unravel. She has been living in hiding under an assumed name with another convicted forger. She was arrested recently for driving without license, registration, or insurance. Yet she spends hour after hour, day in and day out, posting on the internet about Mr. Atchison and his associates. She will not stop. She cannot stop.

This is the anatomy of a con. This is the Oma Hamou story.

Saturday, July 11, 2009

New FELONY CHARGE and ALIAS for Mizz THANG Oma Hamou

Wow, been a busy busy week for our Mizz Thang Oma Hamou now using the NEW ALIAS name of Alexandra McConnell and Alexandra Oma McConnell.

Guess what peepz??? She done gone got her Miss Thang Self ARRESTED FOR A FELONY!

(-Sorry Mr. Moshein, we DID lift your image, but it was too perfect not to use. If you object, say so in your blog and we will gladly take it down.)

So, Check it:
November 7, 2008 ALEXANDRA OMA MCCONNELL is ARRESTED in Victorville California. She is held in Custody (that means "JAIL" kiddies) for like 6 weeks.

ALEXANDRA OMA MCONNELL aka Oma Hamou is Charged with the FELONY CRIME of violation of California Penal Code Section 476, FORGERY of a financial instrument (either a check or she was forging money. Given her "colorful" background with regards to checks, we suspect that.)

OK, at this point, we are going to tell you where you can go to verify this information for yourselves kids, so that our Mizz Thang don't go on some foul mouth tirade that we are lying or making this s*** up...

Go here: http://www.sbcounty.gov/courts/genInfo/openaccess.htm
Click "accept" then search either Alexandra McConnell in Defendant search or just go to case number FVI802540 Defendant 3045972 MCCONNELL, ALEXANDRA OMA

Her initial bail was set at ONE MILLION DOLLARS! see the 12/03/2008 1:30 PM DEPT. V6A IN CUSTODY ARRAIGNMENT

Oma Hamou now aka ALEXANDRA OMA HAMOU sat on her large butt in Jail until December 18, 2008, when bail was reduced to $25,000 and she got bonded out. November 7 until December 18 equals like SIX WEEKS IN JAIL!

Seems like the San Bernardino DA office thinks this is pretty darn serious.

Oh,yeah. Click on Defendant Personal Information. Our now 46 year old (well in two weeks she turns 46) Mizz THANG is a rather "chunky" 5'0 155 lbs. She seems really obsessed about the weight thing too. I mean, she has posted like dozens of times on Moshein's self defending blog that she aint fat, she's a perky size 8...

UMMM MIZZ THANG - You be facing FELONY JAIL TIME girlfriend. You got serious sh** here. You know, maybe being petite and perky aint the best idea at CIW...

We will of course keep close eyes on this one kids...

Friday, May 29, 2009

MAJOR FIND! DID OMA HAMOU DO PORN??

Wow, talk about Freudian slips! Just today, on Oma Hamou's forum, sockpuppet boyfriend Mike said this:
by Mike on Fri May 29, 2009 8:29 am

but buried under this ridicule are little digs, calculated to cause maximum terror to Oma, of we know all about you, we know where are, we have a dossier ALL about you. We have walls full of naked photos of you, YET - not one URL to these photos that they found, and a simple Google does not turn up anything, so they had to have dug and dug to find them, if they have them why can’t they provide the proof?


Now, read this sentence again: a simple Google does not turn up anything (naked photos of Oma Hamou) so they had to have dug and dug to find them, if they have them why can't they provide the proof?

Now, "IF" there ARE NO NAKED PHOTOS of Oma Hamou, Why would anyone bother to Google to see if they could be found? Is that logical?

Now, "IF" there ARE NO naked photos, and walls full of them, of Oma Hamou in existence, Mike would have simply denied their existence. (You know, something like: They MUST be lying, Oma Hamou never did naked pictures...) BUT HE DID NOT! Nope, quite the opposite! In fact, he admitted nude pictures of Oma Hamou EXIST!! "but they had to have dug and dug to find them, if they have them..."

"Mike" now says this is does not use logic. So, we will leave this to YOU peepz to decide:
Someone says to you "I have a wall full of naked pictures of you."
Do you respond:
A."Oh yeah?? show me the pictures to prove you have them, I searched on Google but couldn't find them, so you would have had to have dug and dug to find them, so prove you have them." OR
B. "That's impossible since I never have had any naked pictures taken of me, so you are lying since none actually exist"

WHICH IS THE MORE LOGICAL? Our answer here at OHR is B, nobody has ANY naked pics of us, so they do not exist. We ourselves find it obvious why Oma Hamou answers only A. SO NOW ASK OMA HAMOU: HAVE YOU EVER HAD ANY FULLY NAKED PHOTOGRAPHS TAKEN OF YOURSELF? DID YOU EVER PARTICIPATE IN PORNOGRAPHY OF ANY KIND, INCLUDING "SOFT CORE"?? IF SHE REFUSES TO ANSWER, ASK WHY...WOULD YOU REFUSE TO ANSWER?


We will keep a very close and watchful eye on this one...

Wow Mizz Thang Wannabee a Star but Nevahwuz DID PORNO?? Whoa, but then that WOULD explain WHY she never tells anybody where her "modeling" photos were actually published...

UPDATE June 4: CAN SILENCE SPEAK LOUDER THAN WORDS? We think it probably does. Notice how in recent months, Oma Hamou via her various sockpuppets watch every word written here closely and IMMEDIATELY respond, especially the vulgar foul-mouthed almost illiterate Justin Edwards, who always looks for the limpest weakest excuse to call us (who STILL aren't the people you claim we are) "lying liar a**h*** lying motherf***** liars".

SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO, why is it after five days, not a peep, word or syllable from Oma Hamou? Would YOU remain silent if someone said they had walls of naked pictures of you IF they didn't exist? Where are the vulgar, obscenity laden invectives denying the existence of naked pictures, much less "walls of them", of Oma Hamou and/or of her in Porn?? Why? the answer is obvious, isn't it??

Thursday, May 21, 2009

We Parse the Reality behind Oma Hamou's "new" site

First off, little is "new" on Oma Hamou's latest website incarnation. In fact, most of the verbiage is just cut and pasted from previous posts and "bios" or litigation docs.

However, in the interest of finding the Oma Hamou REALITY, let us parse the meaning behind just a little bit of what she says over there:

Oma Hamou says: Growing up she suffered from poverty and child abuse. To escape her abusive father she boarded a Greyhound bus to Hollywood, California.

What Oma Hamou MEANS: She is a victim.
In claiming the status of victim and by assigning all blame to others, a person can achieve moral superiority while simultaneously disowning any responsibility for one's behavior and its outcome. The victims 'merely' seek justice and fairness. If they become violent, it is only as a last resort, in self-defense. The victim stance is a powerful one. The victim is always morally right, neither responsible nor accountable, and forever entitled to sympathy.



Oma Hamou Says: She went to school, did a lot of modeling work and appeared in several films.

ASK OMA HAMOU: What specific school did you attend, with dates? What specific modeling work did you do, when, and where was it published. What specific "several films" did you appear in? IF you refuse to provide these simple facts, WHY?
For literally years now, Oma Hamou has refused to answer these simple, and direct factual questions. Ask yourself WHY would anyone make this statement but refuse to answer these questions.


Oma Hamou Says: Oma Hamou as a young mother was a victim of domestic violence.
What Oma Hamou MEANS: She is a victim.
In claiming the status of victim and by assigning all blame to others, a person can achieve moral superiority while simultaneously disowning any responsibility for one's behavior and its outcome. The victims 'merely' seek justice and fairness. If they become violent, it is only as a last resort, in self-defense. The victim stance is a powerful one. The victim is always morally right, neither responsible nor accountable, and forever entitled to sympathy. They just really want others to see them as wounded, injured, or suffering in some way in order to elicit sympathy, cloud the picture about just who is the victimizer and who is the victim, and otherwise impression-manage the real victim. They often use this tactic in combination with the tactic of vilifying the victim.



Oma Hamou Says: Now we introduce Bob Atchison and his life partner Rob Moshein, the next set of villains.

Current events derived from meeting these villains have ended in very real attacks where in Oma was beaten and raped while being emotionally beaten with words from Bob's story on the web,

WHAT OMA HAMOU MEANS: She is a victim.
In claiming the status of victim and by assigning all blame to others, a person can achieve moral superiority while simultaneously disowning any responsibility for one's behavior and its outcome. The victims 'merely' seek justice and fairness. If they become violent, it is only as a last resort, in self-defense. The victim stance is a powerful one. The victim is always morally right, neither responsible nor accountable, and forever entitled to sympathy. They just really want others to see them as wounded, injured, or suffering in some way in order to elicit sympathy, cloud the picture about just who is the victimizer and who is the victim, and otherwise impression-manage the real victim. They often use this tactic in combination with the tactic of “vilifying the victim, A clear attempt to literally vilify the real victims. This is a clear and quite literal attempt to vilify the actual victims.


Oma Hamou Says: This time line is offered in the interest of providing a fair and as much as possible unbiased history of the background of Oma Hamou leading up to the verbal war that has been conducted on the Internet by the Hate-Oma? group lead by Bob Atchison and his cult like group surrounding the Alexander Palace Time Machine web site and many of it’s forum members. Versus those who do not believe that anyone should be the focus of a hate propaganda machine specifically those who have defended Oma and as such have in turn become the victims of the hate machine wielded by Atchison and his followers.
What OMA HAMOU MEANS: She is a victim: In claiming the status of victim and by assigning all blame to others, a person can achieve moral superiority while simultaneously disowning any responsibility for one's behavior and its outcome. The victims 'merely' seek justice and fairness. If they become violent, it is only as a last resort, in self-defense. The victim stance is a powerful one. The victim is always morally right, neither responsible nor accountable, and forever entitled to sympathy. They just really want others to see them as wounded, injured, or suffering in some way in order to elicit sympathy, cloud the picture about just who is the victimizer and who is the victim, and otherwise impression-manage the real victim. They often use this tactic in combination with the tactic of vilifying the victim, A clear attempt by Oma Hamouto literally vilify the real victims.


Oma Hamou Says: The imminence and immanence of violence.
What Oma Hamou MEANS: We have no idea. This sentence makes no sense in English.

Read the newest iteration of her site carefully, and bear this in mind. If you do NOT drink Oma Hamou's koolaid and accept what she says as real, you become a bully, a stalker, a hate monger, and if you question her, then she becomes at WAR with you.

THAT is some Oma Hamou REALITY...